简介:摘要:目的:对中老年疝气手术治疗患者的综合护理干预措施进行探讨分析。 方法: 2018年 3月至 2020年 3月我院对 72例疝气手术治疗的中老年患者开展了分析研究,将患者分成了对照组和研究,各 36例,对两组的护理效果开展分析研究。 结果:经过护理,研究组患者的尿潴留发生率是 2.8%,对并发症的认知率是 94.4%,总体的护理满意度是 97.2%,各项指标要比对照组优秀,结果存在统计学差异性( P<0.05)。 结论:中老年疝气手术治疗患者接受综合护理能够提升患者对尿潴留的认知度,缓解症状,提升患者对护理的满意度,值得推广使用。 关键词:疝气手术;中老年患者;综合护理;尿潴留
简介:摘要目的提高对不典型慢性粒细胞白血病(aCML)的认识,掌握其实验室诊断特点。方法对2019年8月当地医院送检的1例aCML患者进行骨髓涂片观察计数原始细胞及细胞形态分析,通过细胞形态学、免疫学、细胞遗传学及分子生物学(MICM)检查结果分析并结合临床进行综合诊断,并文献复习。结果该患者骨髓涂片原始细胞0.07,>10%粒细胞可见核质发育不平衡现象,分叶核可见分叶不良;可见淋巴样小巨核;骨髓活组织检查提示粒系增生活跃,以偏成熟阶段细胞为主,偏幼稚细胞散在少数;CD34小血管(+),圆核细胞散在少(+);E-CAD少数(+);CD61巨核细胞(+),可见单圆核。骨髓流式细胞术示:髓系原始细胞比例为3.8%,粒细胞相对比例增多,其免疫表型CD16、CD13、CD15、CD11b可见明显表达紊乱。BCR-ABL1(p190、p210、p230)融合基因定量检测均阴性;染色体核型分析:46,XY,del(12)(p13)[14]。ASXL1、RUNX1、SRSF2均检测到基因突变。结论结合患者病史及MICM检查结果明确诊断aCML,提示综合多学科检查结果诊断血液肿瘤有重要意义。
简介: 【摘要】 目的 探讨加压护理干预在乳腺癌术后患肢淋巴水肿中的效果。方法 80例乳腺癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组, 各 40例。对照组给予常规护理干预, 观察组在常规护理干预基础上给予加压护理干预。观察两组患者患侧上肢水肿发生情况和发生程度。结果 观察组患者术后 12周上肢水肿共发生 3例, 发生率为 7.5%;对照组患者术后 12周上肢水肿共发生 11例, 发生率为 27.5%;观察组患者术后 12周上肢水肿发生率低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。观察组患侧上肢轻度水肿 2例, 中度水肿 1例, 无一例重度水肿。对照组患侧上肢轻度水肿 3例, 中度水肿 7例, 重度水肿患者 1例。观察组中度和重度水肿所占比例为 2.5%;对照组中度和重度水肿所占比例为 20.0%。观察组中度和重度水肿所占比例低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 加压护理干预能够显著改善乳腺癌术后患侧上肢水肿情况, 护理效果显著, 值得临床推广。 【关键词】 乳腺癌;术后;淋巴水肿;加压护理 [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of pressure nursing intervention in lymphedema of the affected limb after breast cancer operation. Methods 80 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases each. The control group was given routine nursing intervention, and the observation group was given pressure nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing intervention. The incidence and degree of upper extremity edema were observed. Results there were 3 cases of upper extremity edema in the observation group at 12 weeks, the incidence was 7.5%; 11 cases of upper extremity edema in the control group at 12 weeks, the incidence was 27.5%; the incidence of upper extremity edema in the observation group at 12 weeks was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the observation group, there were 2 cases of mild edema, 1 case of moderate edema and no case of severe edema. In the control group, there were 3 cases of mild edema, 7 cases of moderate edema and 1 case of severe edema. The proportion of moderate and severe edema was 2.5% in the observation group and 20.0% in the control group. The proportion of moderate and severe edema in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion compression nursing intervention can significantly improve the edema of the affected side of the upper extremity after breast cancer surgery, and the nursing effect is significant, which is worthy of clinical promotion.