简介:【摘要】目的:探讨突发输液反应与过敏反应的鉴别与处理。方法:选择2021年2月-2023年2月我院诊治的患者,出现突发输液反应和过敏反应的患者共60例,对突发输液反应和过敏反应进行鉴别区分并采取相应的干预措施。根据临床症状计算个情况的比例、两者之间的区分。结果:60例患者突发输液反应与药物过敏反应不同表现的例数,数据有统计学意义(P<0.05);突发输液反应与药物过敏反应有青铜点,也有不同点,通过给药途径、给药剂量、症状、病史及预后情况能够进行区分,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:通过给药途径、给药剂量、症状、病史及预后情况,对突发输液反应及过敏反应进行鉴别,并根据结果采取相应的预防措施,增加过敏反应及输液反应临床上的认知,减少突发输液反应或者过敏反应的医患纠纷之间发生。
简介:摘要目的探讨64层螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA检查中的直插型高压注射器应用及护理方法,提升检查准确度。方法选取2017年4月~2018年4月于我院接受诊断和治疗的疑似冠心病患者76例,使用64层螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA检查中的直插型高压注射器对所有患者进行检查,对64层螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA检查中的直插型高压注射器应用及护理方法进行分析。结果76例患者顺利完成检查,因检查过程中出现期前收缩或心律不齐者有2例,屏气不良导致伪影出现者有2例,所有患者均未出现外渗情况,增强效果均能够达到诊断要求。结论由于直插型高压注射器与针筒型高压注射器在使用方面存在着一定的区别,检查过程中对比剂和盐水的切换会对检查过程造成一定的影响,所以在使用直插型高压注射器对患者进行64层螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA检查之前,首先需要做好对患者的护理准备,减少检查过程中对比剂的使用剂量,降低对比剂外渗的概率。
简介: 【摘要】 目的 研究分析采用骨折复位外固定器对下肢复杂性骨折的治疗效果及不良反应情况。方法 此次研究的对象是选择 2015年 7月~ 2017年 8月 100例下肢复杂性骨折患者,将其临床资料进行回顾性分析,并随机分为治疗组和对照组, 各 50例。治疗组采用骨折复位外固定器治疗, 对照组采用 AO钢板固定治疗。比较并分析两组患者骨折愈合以及不良反应情况。结果 治疗组中 38例愈合优秀, 8例愈合良好, 4例愈合较差, 有效率为 92.0%;对照组中 19例愈合优秀, 20例愈合良好, 11例愈合较差, 有效率为 78.0%, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。同时, 治疗组中 2例患者出现不良反应, 而对照组中则有 8例患者出现不良反应, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 对于治疗下肢复杂性骨折这类疾病时, 采用骨折复位外固定器进行治疗, 能够取得较为理想的治疗效果, 建议临床外科中广泛应用并加以改进。 【关键词】 骨折复位外固定器;下肢复杂性骨折;骨折愈合;不良反应 Objective to study and analyze the efficacy and side effects of fracture reduction external fixator in the treatment of complex fractures of the lower extremities. Methods 100 cases of complex fractures of the lower extremities were selected from July 2015 to August 2017. The clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively, and were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group, each with 50 cases. The treatment group was treated with fracture reduction and external fixator, while the control group was treated with AO plate fixation. The fracture healing and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results in the treatment group, 38 cases healed well, 8 cases healed well, 4 cases had poor healing and the effective rate was 92%. 19 cases in the control group were excellent in healing, 20 cases healed well, 11 cases were poor and the effective rate was 78%. The difference of two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). At the same time, 2 patients in the treatment group had adverse reactions, while 8 cases in the control group had adverse reactions, and the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion for the treatment of complex fracture of lower extremities, the treatment of fracture reduction external fixator can achieve more ideal therapeutic effect. It is recommended to be widely used and improved in clinical surgery.
简介: 【摘要】 目的 研究分析采用骨折复位外固定器对下肢复杂性骨折的治疗效果及不良反应情况。方法 此次研究的对象是选择 2017年 7月~ 2019年 8月 100例下肢复杂性骨折患者,将其临床资料进行回顾性分析,并随机分为治疗组和对照组, 各 50例。治疗组采用骨折复位外固定器治疗, 对照组采用 AO钢板固定治疗。比较并分析两组患者骨折愈合以及不良反应情况。结果 治疗组中 38例愈合优秀, 8例愈合良好, 4例愈合较差, 有效率为 92.0%;对照组中 19例愈合优秀, 20例愈合良好, 11例愈合较差, 有效率为 78.0%, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。同时, 治疗组中 2例患者出现不良反应, 而对照组中则有 8例患者出现不良反应, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 对于治疗下肢复杂性骨折这类疾病时, 采用骨折复位外固定器进行治疗, 能够取得较为理想的治疗效果, 建议临床外科中广泛应用并加以改进。 【关键词】 骨折复位外固定器;下肢复杂性骨折;骨折愈合;不良反应 [Abstract] Objective To study and analyze the treatment effect and adverse reactions of complex fracture of lower extremity with fracture reduction and external fixator. Methods 100 patients with complex fracture of lower extremity from July 2017 to August 2019 were selected in this study, and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. They were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with external fixator and the control group with AO plate. The fracture healing and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results in the treatment group, 38 cases healed well, 8 cases healed well, 4 cases healed poorly, the effective rate was 92.0%; in the control group, 19 cases healed well, 20 cases healed well, 11 cases healed poorly, the effective rate was 78.0%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the same time, 2 patients in the treatment group had adverse reactions, while 8 patients in the control group had adverse reactions. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion in the treatment of complex fracture of the lower extremity, the treatment of fracture reduction and external fixator can achieve a better therapeutic effect. It is suggested that it should be widely used and improved in clinical surgery.